Version 2 2022-03-13, 22:09Version 2 2022-03-13, 22:09
Version 1 2017-12-06, 00:00Version 1 2017-12-06, 00:00
conference contribution
posted on 2022-03-13, 22:09authored byWayne Boyd
Achieving mine closure is intrinsically linked to the selection and successful rehabilitation of a suitable post mining land use. The diverse localities and nature of mining operations require flexible, adaptable and progressive rehabilitation techniques in order to achieve this objective. Similarly, standardised, comparative and repeatable methods for assessing the success of ecosystem rehabilitation are desirable. In Queensland, Australia environmental evaluations that quantify the risk of a rehabilitated site failing are vital to obtaining progressive or final rehabilitation sign off. Key aspects important to rehabilitated ecosystem assessments are characterisation of their states, identifying their transitional trajectories and assessing their resilience. A two stage assessment process is presented. The first stage involves comparative analyses of rehabilitation site monitoring data against reference or analogue sites (similarity assessments) and the second stage consists of scenario based future state simulations to determine resilience and to assess risk based potential failure (prognostic simulations). Ecological structure analysis (clustering and ordination) and probability based cellular automata spatial modelling are the respective tools and techniques employed.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Start Page
6
Start Date
2010-01-01
Finish Date
2010-12-01
Location
CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Qld.
Publisher
Institute for Resource Industries and Sustainability
Place of Publication
Rockhampton, Qld.
Peer Reviewed
No
Open Access
No
External Author Affiliations
Centre for Environmental Management; Institute for Resource Industries and Sustainability (IRIS);
Era Eligible
No
Name of Conference
2nd Annual Conference of the IRIS Postgraduate Students: resourcing for the future