posted on 2017-12-06, 00:00authored byJ Sweeney, G Soutar
Cognitive dissonance is central to consumer decision making in some contexts, typically major purchases. This led Sweeney et al. (2000) to develop a scale that recognised the emotional and cognitive components of cognitive dissonance. The scale, however, is unbalanced as the emotional subscale has 15 items, compared to the three and four items used to measure the two cognitive subscales. Given that some items may be superfluous when the alpha coefficient is above 0.80 (Rossiter, 2002), as was the case for this scale in the original study, and also considering the need to minimise respondent fatigue (DeVellis, 2003), the present study investigated the possibility of reducing the emotional subscale, while maintaining the strong measurement properties of the original scale. Using some of the data from Sweeney, Hausknecht and Soutar (2000), a five-item emotional subscale was developed, resulting in a 12-item dissonance scale, which was short, reliable and valid.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Editor
Kennedy J; Di Milia V
Parent Title
Proceedings of the 20th ANZAM Conference [electronic resource] : Management : pragmatism, philosophy, priorities
Start Page
1
End Page
9
Number of Pages
9
Start Date
2006-01-01
ISBN-10
1921047348
Location
Yeppoon, Qld.
Publisher
Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management
Place of Publication
Lindfield, NSW
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Open Access
No
External Author Affiliations
Business School; International conference;
Era Eligible
No
Name of Conference
Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management. International conference