posted on 2017-12-06, 00:00authored byGordon Stewart, S Horneman-Wren
In a previous paper, the authors (Stewart & Horneman-Wren 2006) argued that the enactment of the Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act 2005 represented a ‘watershed’ in the history of industrial relations in Australia. At that time, Gordon Stewart and Sandy Horneman-Wren (2006, p. 31) argued ‘that there will be no easy or obvious turning back to an era dominated by a comprehensive system of industrial awards, which are maintained by a quasi-social partnership of governments, trade unions, employer associations and tribunal members’. They further argued that ‘the movement away from the conciliation and arbitration power towards the corporations power of the Commonwealth Constitution has substance’. Be that as it may, the purpose of this particular paper is to assess the extent to which the Rudd Government’s industrial relations legislation (both enacted and proposed) modifies or qualifies this assessment of the significance of the Howard Government’s Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act 2005.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Parent Title
PERA 2008. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Pacific Employment Relations Association Conference, 19-22 November 2009, Ballarat, Vic.
Start Page
224
End Page
234
Number of Pages
11
Start Date
2009-01-01
ISBN-13
9781876851347
Location
Ballarat, Victoria
Publisher
University of Ballarat
Place of Publication
Ballarat, Vic
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Open Access
No
External Author Affiliations
Conference; Faculty of Arts, Business, Informatics and Education; Not affiliated to a Research Institute;